2693693 Ontario Inc. v. Palmieri et al.
2693693 ONTARIO INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

S. Bhangu

ROSEMARY PALMIERI
Law Firm / Organization
Himelfarb Proszanski LLP
Lawyer(s)

David Himelfarb

DE ZEN REALTY COMPANY LTD.
Law Firm / Organization
Himelfarb Proszanski LLP
Lawyer(s)

David Himelfarb

JOHN DOE 1
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
SAM JONATHAN LEE
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

Y. Enbar

MASTER’S ROOFING AND SUPPLIES INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

Y. Enbar

JOHN DOE 2
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified

Summary:

  • 2693693 Ontario Inc. (Plaintiff) leased a property from De Zen Realty, managed by Palmieri.
  • The lease included clauses regarding liability and insurance, notably absolving the landlord from liability for certain damages and requiring the tenant to maintain insurance.
  • After a fire caused damage, the Plaintiff sought to hold the landlord and its agents (including Master’s Roofing and Sam Lee) liable for negligence and breach of contract.
  • Both defendant groups sought summary judgment to dismiss the claims against them.

Key Points:

  • Liability and Insurance Clauses: The court focused on the lease's clauses, especially the tenant's insurance obligations and an exclusion clause limiting the landlord's liability.
  • Summary Judgment Granted: The court concluded that the Plaintiff assumed the risk of loss due to its insurance obligations under the lease, leading to the dismissal of claims against both defendant groups.
  • Exclusion of Liability: The exclusion clause (Article 6.12) was deemed valid, negating liability for De Zen and its agents regarding the fire damage.
  • No Waiver of Obligations: The court found no evidence of waiver by the landlord regarding the Plaintiff’s insurance obligations and rejected arguments that the lease’s terms were unconscionable or inapplicable.
  • Appropriateness for Summary Judgment: The court deemed the case suitable for summary judgment, finding that further evidence at trial was unnecessary for a just resolution.
  • The document does not specify the total amount of costs awarded
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-21-00000173-0000
Corporate & commercial law
Defendant