Facts: The plaintiffs, Baxandall and Nelson, own property adjacent to the defendants, the Campbells. They alleged that the Campbells' structures (a deck and fences) encroached on their property.

Issue: The main legal issue was whether the structures owned by the Campbells trespassed onto the Baxandall and Nelson property and, if so, what remedies were appropriate, including the potential removal of the encroaching structures.

Court's Ruling: The court's decision focused on determining the exact boundary between the two properties and whether the Campbells' structures encroached upon the plaintiffs' land. The ruling was based on the findings of a land survey and considered the history of the properties and structures in question.

Costs/Damages: The document did not specify the exact amount of costs or damages awarded. The court's decision would likely address the removal of the encroaching structures and any necessary restitution or compensation based on the established boundary and the nature of the encroachment.