Rosebrook v. Hill Times Publishing Inc.
LAWNEY ROSEBROOK
Law Firm / Organization
Frederick Wu Professional Corporation
Lawyer(s)

Frederick W. Wu

HILL TIMES PUBLISHING INC. / PUBLICATIONS HILL TIMES INC.
Law Firm / Organization
ORP Law
Lawyer(s)

Brendan J. Hughes

CANADIAN ANTI-HATE NETWORK
Law Firm / Organization
Dipchand LLP
Lawyer(s)

May M. Cheng

MARK SLAPINSKI
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified

Background:

  • Lawney Rosebrook initiated a copyright and moral rights infringement action as a simplified action under the Federal Courts Rules.
  • Disagreement arose between Rosebrook and CAHN regarding the timing for serving documents listed by Rosebrook, with CAHN wanting immediate access to prepare discovery questions.

Key Issues:

  • The procedural issue focused on when documents relevant to the case should be provided in the context of a simplified action, specifically whether they should be served before or as part of the written discovery process.

Court’s Analysis and Decision:

  • Associate Judge Trent Horne decided that delaying the service of documents would impede the efficient completion of discoveries and be contrary to the principles of procedural simplification.
  • The court ordered Rosebrook to produce copies of all documents in the list to all parties by March 28, 2024, aiming to maintain the scheduled discovery timeline.
  • The court awarded costs of the motion to CAHN, indicating that while Rosebrook’s interpretation of the rules was not incorrect, it favored procedural formality over substance.

Outcome:

  • Rosebrook was directed to provide the documents to all parties forthwith to facilitate an efficient discovery process.
  • Costs were awarded to defendant, CAHN, due to the unnecessary complication caused by the plaintiff’s stance. No amount specified.
Federal Court
T-1702-23
Intellectual property
Defendant