Waterloo v. MXM
WATERLOO BREWING LTD.
MXM BEVERAGES LTD.

Background:

  • Waterloo Brewing Ltd. sought payment from MXM Beverages Ltd. for failing to meet minimum order quantities specified in their contract, and for unpaid invoices.

Key Issues:

  • Whether MXM was required to pay Waterloo for not meeting the contractually agreed minimum order quantities.
  • The appropriateness of resolving the dispute through an application rather than a trial, given the complex issues and disputed facts, particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Court's Analysis and Decision:

  • The court decided to convert the application into an action, meaning the case will proceed to a full trial rather than being decided as an application. This decision means that a final ruling on the claims and disputes between the parties has not been made. Successful party cannot be determined as of this point.
  • The judge highlighted the necessity of exploring the broader factual matrix, including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent agreements or discussions that might affect contract enforcement.
  • There was acknowledgment of the potential for disputed facts and the need for discoveries to ascertain details like actual production capacity and financial impacts.

Outcome:

  • The application by Waterloo Brewing Ltd. for immediate payment based on contract terms was not granted.
  • The case will proceed to trial to thoroughly examine the disputed facts and legal issues, particularly concerning the enforceability of the contract terms during the pandemic.
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-22-0069310-0000
Civil litigation