CIBC v. 2391642 Ontario Inc.
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
Law Firm / Organization
Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP
2391642 Ontario Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Lal Law Office
Sarvanithi Yogarajan Velippillai
Law Firm / Organization
Lal Law Office
Chuckles Jack Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Lal Law Office
  • Background: CIBC sought summary judgment against Defendants 2391642 Ontario Inc., Sarvanithi Yogarajan Veluppillai, and Chuckles Jack Inc. for default on three loans totaling $559,293, possession of two properties as loan security, and $13,481.85 for unauthorized overdraft account accruals. The Defendants conceded there was no genuine issue for trial regarding the loans but contested the overdraft account charges, which CIBC later withdrew.

  • Issues/Main Discussion:

    • Whether there is a genuine issue requiring a trial.
    • If Defendants are in default of the loan agreements and the remedies entitled.
  • Ruling:

    • The court found no genuine issue requiring a trial, granting summary judgment in favor of CIBC. It was determined Defendants are in default of the loan agreements.
    • Remedies granted include payment of the loan principal and interest, delivery of two properties to CIBC, and permission for CIBC to issue writs of possession for these properties.
  • Amount Awarded:

    • Total of $559,293 for the outstanding loans and accrued interest.
    • Costs awarded to CIBC amounted to $24,851.78, inclusive of disbursements.
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-23-91987
Civil litigation
$ 584,145
Plaintiff