Programmed Ins v. Stoneridge Ins
PROGRAMMED INSURANCE BROKERS INC.
STONERIDGE INSURANCE BROKERS
Law Firm / Organization
Goodmans LLP
PREFERRED INSURAMCE GROUP LIMITED
Law Firm / Organization
Goodmans LLP
THEODORE A. PUCCCINI
Law Firm / Organization
Goodmans LLP
CHRIS OVECKA
Law Firm / Organization
Goodmans LLP
EVELYN KONECNY
Law Firm / Organization
Goodmans LLP
LAURA VAN BOXTEL
Law Firm / Organization
Goodmans LLP
DEBBIE VAN HELDEN
Law Firm / Organization
Goodmans LLP
KACY WARWICK
Law Firm / Organization
Goodmans LLP
MIRANDA NEGRI
Law Firm / Organization
Goodmans LLP

Overview:

Programmed Insurance Brokers Inc. (Plaintiff) filed a motion for interim injunctive relief against Stoneridge Insurance Brokers, Preferred Insurance Group Limited, and several individual defendants (Defendants), pending a hearing for an interlocutory injunction set for February 21, 2024. The motion sought to restrain the Defendants from using the Plaintiff's confidential client information and soliciting its business.

Key Points:

  • The Plaintiff is an insurance brokerage claiming that its former employees, who are now employed by the Defendants, resigned en masse and were recruited by the Defendants' brokerages to solicit business from the Plaintiff's client base.
  • A whistleblower provided evidence supporting the Plaintiff's claims.
  • The Defendants argued that an injunction was unnecessary due to an undertaking provided in response to the motion, claiming they had no interest in using the Plaintiff's confidential information.
  • The court granted interim relief regarding the confidentiality of the Plaintiff's information, considering it essential to protect against the potential misuse of such information.
  • The request for an interim order on non-solicitation was deemed unnecessary at this stage due to the formulation of the order against using confidential information.

Conclusion:

The court issued an interim injunction focused on protecting the Plaintiff's confidential information from misuse by the Defendants. The order specifically prohibits the Defendants from disclosing, using for their own purposes, altering, destroying, copying, removing, or transferring any documents or information containing the Plaintiff's confidential data. The Plaintiff was awarded agreed-upon costs for the motion. No amount specified in the document.

Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-23-00711350-0000
Labour law
Plaintiff