Facts: Marples sold a hair salon to Biddlecome with an agreement not to compete. Despite the agreement, Marples started a new salon nearby. Biddlecome sued for breach of contract and intimidation.
Issue: Whether Marples breached the contract and if the actions constituted intimidation.
Court's Ruling: The court found Marples in breach of the non-compete agreement and guilty of intimidation. It emphasized the legal obligation to honor contractual agreements and the consequences of interference with business operations.
Costs/Damages Awarded: The court awarded damages for lost profits to Biddlecome, though the exact amount is not specified in the summary provided. The ruling underscored the enforcement of non-compete clauses and protection against business interference.
