Rochette v. Bradburn
Sylvie Rochette
Law Firm / Organization
Reed Pope Law Corporation
Lawyer(s)

Trevor W. Morley

Jim Tennant
Law Firm / Organization
Reed Pope Law Corporation
Lawyer(s)

Trevor W. Morley

Laura Podgorenko
Law Firm / Organization
Reed Pope Law Corporation
Lawyer(s)

Trevor W. Morley

Bruce Bradburn
Law Firm / Organization
Cox Taylor
Lawyer(s)

Neil Carfra

Arthur Roberts
Law Firm / Organization
Cox Taylor
Lawyer(s)

Neil Carfra

Mary Matchett
Law Firm / Organization
Cox Taylor
Lawyer(s)

Neil Carfra

The Owners, Strata Plan 962
Law Firm / Organization
Hamilton & Company
Lawyer(s)

Ben Scheidegger

  • Facts: Dispute between strata owners who are full-time residents and those who rent out their suites. Issues with management and governance by the strata corporation, including handling complaints and maintenance.
  • Issue: Plaintiffs allege negligence by the strata corporation in managing the property, leading to deterioration of living conditions and property value.
  • Court's Ruling: The court's ruling in "Rochette v. Bradburn" involved several key decisions:
    • Strata Corporation's Application Dismissed: The court dismissed the Strata Corporation’s application to strike the notice of civil claim, allowing the plaintiffs to amend their notice to properly plead their damages claim.
    • Amendment Allowed: Plaintiffs were given leave to amend the notice of civil claim to adequately address and plead their damages claim. The court set a deadline of 30 days from the release of these reasons for the plaintiffs to file and serve the amended notice.
    • Mixed Success: The court acknowledged mixed success in the application, leading to the decision that each party would bear their own costs.
  • Costs/Damages Awarded: The specific amount of costs or damages awarded to the successful party was not mentioned in the accessible content of the document.
Supreme Court of British Columbia
S194145
Civil litigation
Other