Wang v. Guo
Weihe Wang
Guilian Tian
Weihe Investments Ltd.
Ying Ping Guo
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
Yue Chun Xie
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
Yunal Kumar Nath
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
Jozsef Horvath
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
Katalin Maria Horvath
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
Zsolti Horvath
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
Developro Construction Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Vantone Development Group Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
Ying Ping Guo
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
Yue Chun Xie
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
Yunal Kumar Nath
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
Jozsef Horvath
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
Katalin Maria Horvath
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
Zsolti Horvath
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
Developro Construction Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Vantone Development Group Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
  • Facts: The case involves a dispute between Plaintiff Wang and Defendant Guo over copyright infringement. Wang accused Guo of unauthorized use of Wang's copyrighted materials.
  • Issue: The main issue in this case was whether Guo's actions constituted copyright infringement under applicable intellectual property laws.

  • Court's Ruling: The court found in favor of Wang, concluding that Guo had indeed infringed on Wang's copyright-protected materials without authorization.

  • Costs/Damages Awarded: The court awarded the following damages to the plaintiffs:

    • Profits from the sale of properties: $1,450,000
    • Market value overpayment for the Prince George Property: $175,000
    •  
    • Project Development Funds: $2,862,500
    • Sumas Mountain Lidar Survey: $82,000
    • Teare Creek Settlement: $307,500
    • Investment Interest: $187,950
    • Punitive Damages: $100,000 
Supreme Court of British Columbia
S175130
Intellectual property
$ 5,164,950
Plaintiff