Nahra v. Orange Transport
Joe Nahra
Law Firm / Organization
McCague Borlack LLP
Lawyer(s)

Zohaib Ahmed

Orange Transport Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
BD Law Offices
Lawyer(s)

Martin Black

Charbel Matar
Law Firm / Organization
BD Law Offices
Lawyer(s)

Martin Black

Maroun Aoun
Law Firm / Organization
BD Law Offices
Lawyer(s)

Martin Black

6794491 Canada Inc. o/a MTC Auto Sales
Law Firm / Organization
BD Law Offices
Lawyer(s)

Martin Black

Wantcar Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
BD Law Offices
Lawyer(s)

Martin Black

Wadih Matar
Law Firm / Organization
Dentons Canada LLP
Lawyer(s)

Emily McMurtry

Gladiator Auto Transport Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
McCague Borlack LLP
Lawyer(s)

Zohaib Ahmed

  • Background: Joe Nahra and Orange Transport Inc., among others, are embroiled in a dispute involving accusations of misappropriation and fiduciary duty breaches.
  • Facts: Nahra, Aoun, and C. Matar were business partners in MTC and Orange Transport. Conflicts arose leading to Nahra being sidelined from the businesses, with allegations of asset misappropriation and establishment of a competing business, Gladiator.
  • Issues: The core issues were whether a Mareva injunction should be granted to prevent asset dissipation and if a certificate of pending litigation (CPL) could be registered against Nahra's property.
  • Ruling: The court denied the Mareva injunction and CPL registration, concluding that the moving parties failed to demonstrate a strong prima facie case or that Nahra intended to dissipate assets to avoid judgment.
  • Costs: The decision on costs was deferred, allowing parties to submit their costs outline for consideration.
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-18-76724
Corporate & commercial law
Plaintiff