Facts: The case revolves around a dispute concerning the termination of a tenancy based on the landlord's claim (petitioner) that their daughter intended to occupy the unit. The tenants (respondents) challenged the eviction when the landlord's daughter did not move in, leading to a compensation claim.
Issue: The primary issue was whether the landlord genuinely intended for their daughter to occupy the rental unit as claimed when terminating the tenancy.
Court's Ruling: The court dismissed the landlord's application for judicial review, upholding the arbitrator's decision that favored the tenants. It found the arbitrator's decision to be fair and the reasons provided to be adequate.
Costs/Damages Awarded: The document does not specify the amount of costs or damages awarded to the successful party.
