Namena Corp. v Ameri-Can Pharma Inc.
Namena Corp.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

Shahzad Siddiqui

Namena Pharma Corp.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

Shahzad Siddiqui

Ameri-Can Pharma Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

Michael B. Lesage

Thinesh Sivarajah
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

Michael B. Lesage

36 Pharma Consulting Services Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
  • Background: Namena Corp. initiated a lawsuit against Ameri-Can Pharma Inc., Thinesh Sivarajah, and 36 Pharma Consulting Services Inc., alleging failure to disclose intellectual property necessary for product development and misappropriation of funds through excessive expense claims.
  • Parties Involved: Plaintiffs are Namena Corp. and Namena Pharma Corp. Defendants include Ameri-Can Pharma Inc., Thinesh Sivarajah, and 36 Pharma Consulting Services Inc.
  • Issues/Main Discussion: The motion addressed multiple points, including production of documents from third parties, answering outstanding undertakings and refusals, and the consideration to strike the statement of defense for non-compliance.
  • Ruling: The court ordered the production of certain documents from third parties and required Sivarajah to reattend discovery to answer specific questions. The motion to strike the defense was denied.
  • Costs Awarded: The plaintiff was awarded $4,000 in partial indemnity costs, payable by the defendants within 30 days.
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-20-646688
Intellectual property
$ 4,000
Plaintiff