Facts: Top Down Investments Inc. and partners allege an agreement with Fred Kranz for managing and potentially purchasing a 126-unit apartment building post-renovation. Kranz disputes the binding nature of the agreement.
Issue: The core dispute is whether a binding agreement existed between the parties for the management and potential purchase of the property.
Court’s Ruling: The court addressed document production requests, granting some based on relevance and specificity, while narrowing or denying others. The ruling focused on procedural aspects rather than the substantive dispute.
Costs/Damages: Mr. Kranz has been substantially successful in this application and is entitled to his costs in the cause. Financial terms were not specified.