Facts: Hui Han petitioned to set aside an RTB order favoring Ying Ma for possession of a property. Han argued improper service of dispute notice, questioned the RTB's jurisdiction, and alleged procedural unfairness.
Issue: The main issue was whether the RTB's decision was patently unreasonable due to alleged improper service and procedural unfairness.
Court's Ruling: The court found the service to Han was improper, affecting her right to a fair hearing. It ruled in favor of Han, setting aside the RTB decision and ordering a new hearing.
Costs/Damages: Costs were awarded to Hui Han, payable by Ying Ma, though the exact amount is not specified in the provided summary.