Gagnon et al. v. Genesis Gardens Inc. et al.
Marthe Gagnon
Law Firm / Organization
Low Murchison Radnoff LLP
Lawyer(s)

Gary Gordon Boyd

Estate Trustee for the Estate of Solange Plourde-Gagnon
Law Firm / Organization
Low Murchison Radnoff LLP
Lawyer(s)

Gary Gordon Boyd

Marthe Gagnon
Law Firm / Organization
Low Murchison Radnoff LLP
Lawyer(s)

Gary Gordon Boyd

Genesis Gardens Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Rogers Partners LLP
Lawyer(s)

Jordan Petruska

Julie Rondeau
Law Firm / Organization
Rogers Partners LLP
Lawyer(s)

Jordan Petruska

Case Background:

  • Incident: Solange Plourde-Gagnon, a resident at Genesis Gardens, was allegedly assaulted by Rondeau, a cook employed at the retirement home, in July 2015. The plaintiff claims improper medical care followed the assault, contributing to her death in 2020.
  • Legal Action: Claims include assault, negligence, breach of contract, and fiduciary duty.

Motion:

  • The plaintiff sought permission to amend the statement of claim, governed by Rule 26.01 of Ontario's Rules of Civil Procedure.
  • The defendants opposed some amendments, arguing they introduced new causes of action outside the limitation period and improperly pleaded evidence.

Key Issues:

  • Breach of Fiduciary Duty: The court allowed the amendment, noting the possibility that there is no limitation period for assault claims involving vulnerable, dependent individuals under the Limitations Act, 2002.
  • Breach of Contract: The court ruled that the amendment does not introduce a new cause of action as the breach of contract claim arises from the same facts already pleaded.
  • Pleading of Evidence: Some proposed amendments, particularly referencing investigations and fines, were considered evidence rather than material facts. Paragraph 35, referencing a regulatory fine, was struck out.

Costs: The plaintiff was awarded $5,000 in costs, considering the simplicity of the motion.

Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-17-73323
Civil litigation
$ 5,000
Plaintiff