Li et al. v. Barber et al.
ZEXI LI, HAPPY GOAT COFFEE COMPANY INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Champ & Associates
Lawyer(s)

Paul Champ

7983794 CANADA INC (c.o.b. as UNION: LOCAL 613)
Law Firm / Organization
Champ & Associates
Lawyer(s)

Paul Champ

GEOFFREY DELANEY
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
CHRIS BARBER
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Thomson LLP
Lawyer(s)

James A. Manson

BENJAMIN DICHTER
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
TAMARA LICH
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Thomson LLP
Lawyer(s)

James A. Manson

PATRICK KING
Law Firm / Organization
McCulloch Mooney Johnston Selby LLP
JAMES BAUDER
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
BRIGITTE BELTON
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
DANIEL BULFORD
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Thomson LLP
Lawyer(s)

James A. Manson

DALE ENNS
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Thomson LLP
Lawyer(s)

James A. Manson

CHAD EROS
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
CHRIS GARRAH
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
MIRANDA GASIOR
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Thomson LLP
Lawyer(s)

James A. Manson

JOE JANZEN
Law Firm / Organization
McCulloch Mooney Johnston Selby LLP
JASON LAFACE
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
TOM MARAZZO
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Thomson LLP
Lawyer(s)

James A. Manson

RYAN MIHILEWICZ
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Thomson LLP
Lawyer(s)

James A. Manson

SEAN TIESSEN
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Thomson LLP
Lawyer(s)

James A. Manson

NICHLOAS ST. LOUIS (a.k.a. @NOBODYCARIBOU)
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
FREEDOM 2022 HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Thomson LLP
Lawyer(s)

James A. Manson

GIVESENDGO LLC
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
JACOB WELLS
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
HAROLD JONKER
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Thomson LLP
Lawyer(s)

James A. Manson

JONKER TRUCKING INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Thomson LLP
Lawyer(s)

James A. Manson

BRAD HOWLAND
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Thomson LLP
Lawyer(s)

James A. Manson

  • Facts: A proposed class action by Ottawa residents, business owners, and employees against the organizers and participants of the "Freedom Convoy" protest, alleging disruptions caused by the protest.
  • Issues: Application of anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) legislation, considering the balance between freedom of expression and the plaintiffs' rights to property and business operation.
  • Ruling: The court dismissed the defendants' motion to halt the class proceeding under the anti-SLAPP legislation, allowing the case to proceed. The decision emphasizes the public interest in determining the liability of protestors for alleged disruptions.
  • Amount Awarded: Not applicable; the ruling focused on the continuation of the legal proceedings rather than monetary damages.
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-22-88514-CP
Civil litigation
Plaintiff