Akhtar v. Taha Development
Ali Syed Akhtar
Law Firm / Organization
SimpsonWigle Law LLP
Lawyer(s)

Derek A. Schmuck

Fatima Khan
Law Firm / Organization
SimpsonWigle Law LLP
Lawyer(s)

Derek A. Schmuck

Shamim Fatima
Law Firm / Organization
SimpsonWigle Law LLP
Lawyer(s)

Derek A. Schmuck

Taha Development Group Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Scarfone Hawkins LLP
Lawyer(s)

Alaa Noui

Omre Taha
Law Firm / Organization
Scarfone Hawkins LLP
Lawyer(s)

Alaa Noui

April Taha also known as April McDonald-Taha
Law Firm / Organization
Scarfone Hawkins LLP
Lawyer(s)

Alaa Noui

Iron Horse Contractors Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Scarfone Hawkins LLP
Lawyer(s)

Alaa Noui

Emad Sharqiya
Law Firm / Organization
Scarfone Hawkins LLP
Lawyer(s)

Alaa Noui

  • Parties: Ali Syed Akhtar, Fatima Khan, and Shamim Fatima (Plaintiffs) vs. Taha Development Group Inc., Omre Taha, April Taha also known as April McDonald-Taha, Iron Horse Contractors Inc., Emad Sharqiya (Defendants).
  • Facts: The plaintiffs' claim involved work to be performed on property in Mississauga, with disputes over payments.
  • Issues: The case focused on setting aside a noting in default against the defendants and imposing terms for it.
  • Ruling: The court set aside the noting in default, allowing the defendants to defend the claim, without imposing security for costs but awarding plaintiffs' costs of $12,400, to be paid by the defendants.
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-23-00082631-000
Civil litigation
$ 12,400
Defendant