Realtech Capital Group Inc. v. 8866999 (New Oakridge) Ltd.
8866999 (New Oakridge) Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
Lawyer(s)

Forrest Finn

New Oakridge Investment Limited Partnership
Law Firm / Organization
Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
Lawyer(s)

Forrest Finn

New Oakridge Investment Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
Lawyer(s)

Forrest Finn

Zhong Liang
Law Firm / Organization
Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
Lawyer(s)

Forrest Finn

He Xing Liang
Law Firm / Organization
Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
Lawyer(s)

Forrest Finn

JPV Real Estate Capital Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
Lawyer(s)

Forrest Finn

JPV Real Estate Capital (Oakridge) Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
Lawyer(s)

Forrest Finn

Align BC Properties Corp.
Law Firm / Organization
Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
Lawyer(s)

Forrest Finn

Align BC Development (Oakridge) Corp.
Law Firm / Organization
Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
Lawyer(s)

Forrest Finn

Realtech Capital Group Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
DLA Piper (Canada) LLP
Lawyer(s)

Colin Brousson

Peterson Investment Group Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
DLA Piper (Canada) LLP
Lawyer(s)

Colin Brousson

Earlston Mortgage Corp.
Law Firm / Organization
DLA Piper (Canada) LLP
Lawyer(s)

Colin Brousson

  • Facts:

    • Realtech Capital Group Inc., Peterson Investment Group Inc., and Earlston Mortgage Corp. sought a sealing order for an affidavit in a foreclosure proceeding.
    • The affidavit contained details of a Purchase and Sale Agreement (PSA) deemed commercially sensitive and confidential.
    • The PSA had a confidentiality clause preventing disclosure of its terms.
  • Issue:

    • The applicants argued for the sealing of the affidavit to protect commercial interests and the integrity of distressed sales processes, including foreclosure proceedings.
  • Court's Ruling:

    • The court granted a partial sealing order.
    • It ordered the sealing of specific parts of the affidavit, notably the PSA details, but allowed the disclosure of the purchase's basic terms and the proposed purchaser's identity.
    • The court balanced the need for confidentiality against the public interest in open court proceedings and found that the entirety of the sealing sought was not warranted.
    • The sealing order is to remain in place until further court order.
  • Costs or Damages Awarded:

    • The judgment does not specify costs or damages awarded to any party. The focus was on the sealing order's appropriateness and scope??.
Supreme Court of British Columbia
H230433
Corporate & commercial law
Petitioner