Facts: Sarah Sayyari, terminated by the Provincial Health Services Authority, filed a human rights complaint alleging age discrimination, later amending it to include mental disability. A settlement was reportedly reached, which Sayyari later refused to sign.
Issues: Whether the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to determine the existence of a settlement agreement, challenged by Sayyari asserting such power rests exclusively with the Human Rights Tribunal.
Ruling: Appeal dismissed. The Court held it does have jurisdiction to enforce settlement agreements and to determine their existence, terms, and breaches, as per the Human Rights Code.
Amount Awarded: Not applicable; the decision focused on jurisdiction and enforcement of settlement agreements.
