Neale Engineering Ltd. v. Ross Land Mushroom Farm Ltd.
Neale Engineering Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Harper Grey LLP
Ross Land Mushroom Farm Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Ferro Building Systems Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

K.N. Orr

Dynacor Coatings (2004) Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Stobbe Construction Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
RPM Canada Company/Compagnie RPM Canada
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

G. Khosa

RMP Canada Investment Company, a Partnership Doing Business as a Proprietorship Known as RPM Canada Doing Business as a Sole Proprietorship Known as Carboline
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

G. Khosa

  • Facts: Ferro Building Systems Ltd. sought to file a third-party notice against Neale Engineering Ltd. for contribution and indemnity, which Neale Engineering opposed due to an expired limitation period.
  • Issues: Whether the limitation period for Ferro's third-party claim had begun to run and if it was statute-barred.
  • Ruling: The appeal was allowed. The court found that the limitation period for a claim for contribution or indemnity is "discovered" when a claimant is served with a pleading that could result in them paying more than their share of damages, not necessarily when a pleading alleging fault by two or more persons is served. The proposed third-party proceedings against Neale Engineering were deemed statute-barred.
  • Amount Awarded: Not applicable; the focus was on the interpretation of the Limitation Act and the timing for third-party claims.
Court of Appeals for British Columbia
CA48873
Corporate & commercial law
Appellant