Facts: Plaintiffs allege they advanced funds to defendants based on an oral agreement for purchasing and developing real estate, partially documented.
Issue: Whether the plaintiffs' claim disclosed a viable interest in the properties to justify Certificates of Pending Litigation (CPLs).
Court's Ruling: The court found the plaintiffs' pleadings insufficient to establish a direct connection between the funds advanced and the properties, leading to the cancellation of the CPLs.
Costs/Damages: The document did not specify the amount of costs or damages awarded.
