Issue: Whether Schedule E, containing an option to purchase property, was a standalone contract or part of a broader contract of sale.
Ruling: Appeal dismissed. The court found Schedule E was not a standalone contract and upheld specific performance, ordering the property's transfer to the respondent.
Key Points:
The contract aimed to circumvent subdivision restrictions, making its terms complex.
Specific performance was granted due to the property's unique significance to the respondent.
The issue of consideration for the property's transfer was remitted to the trial judge for determination.
Amount Awarded: Specific to costs, the determination of consideration for the property transfer remitted to the trial judge.
