Issue: Appeal against dismissal of application for oppression remedies under the Business Corporations Act.
Ruling: Appeal allowed in part. The chambers judge's dismissal upheld due to insufficient evidence for claimed reasonable expectations. However, the award for special costs was overturned.
Key Points:
The appellants failed to provide sufficient evidence to establish their reasonable expectations were violated.
The chambers judge did not err in her conclusions regarding the lack of evidence.
Special costs initially awarded due to perceived reckless indifference were overturned on appeal, replaced with ordinary costs.
Amount Awarded: No specific amount awarded; special costs order was replaced with an order for ordinary costs.
