Peoples Trust Company et al. v. Vandyk-Backyard Queensview Limited et al.
Peoples Trust Company
Law Firm / Organization
Thornton Grout Finnigan LLP
Lawyer(s)

Puya Fesharaki

Law Firm / Organization
Robins Appleby LLP
Firm Capital Mortgage Fund Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Thornton Grout Finnigan LLP
Lawyer(s)

Puya Fesharaki

Law Firm / Organization
Robins Appleby LLP
Vandyk-Backyard Queensview Limited
Law Firm / Organization
Paliare Roland Rosenberg Rothstein LLP
Lawyer(s)

Jeffrey Larry

Vandyk-Backyard Humberside Limited
Law Firm / Organization
Paliare Roland Rosenberg Rothstein LLP
Lawyer(s)

Jeffrey Larry

T A Appliance Inc
Law Firm / Organization
Giffen LLP
Lawyer(s)

Cynthia Davis

Urban Mechanical Contracting Ltd
Kingsett Mortgage Corporation
Law Firm / Organization
Bennett Jones LLP
Lawyer(s)

Sean H. Zweig

Plycon Forming Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Soccol Law Barristers & Solicitors
Lawyer(s)

Fabio Mark Soccol

Raymond Chabot Inc. As Receiver Over the Assets and Undertakings of 2164705 Ontario Inc O/A Sitescape
Law Firm / Organization
Drudi, Alexiou, Kuchar LLP
TDB Restructuring Limited, Court-appointed Receiver
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

Jeffrey Berger

KC Structural Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Cambridge LLP
Lawyer(s)

Salma Kebeich

Classic Tile Contractors Ltd.
Torre D.C.C. Carpentry Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Drudi, Alexiou, Kuchar LLP
Foremont Drywall (Highrise/ICI Division) Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Bianchi Presta LLP
Lawyer(s)

Elizabeth Iellimo

Overview:

  • The case concerns a dispute over lien priority between a registered mortgage (held by Peoples Trust Company and Firm Capital Mortgage Fund Inc., "First Mortgagee") and unregistered construction liens filed by contractors (Classic Tile Contractors Ltd. and Urban Mechanical Contracting Ltd., "Lien Claimants").
  • The issue was whether the First Mortgage had priority over unregistered construction liens under Ontario's Construction Act.

Key Points:

  1. Background:

    • The Borrowers developed a condominium project, selling most units but retaining 21 unsold units ("Unsold Units").
    • First Mortgagee advanced a $12.7M loan in August 2023, secured by a registered mortgage.
    • Contractors registered construction liens after this advance, asserting unpaid claims.
  2. Court's Decision:

    • First Mortgage Priority: The court ruled the First Mortgage took precedence over unregistered liens because:
      • The liens were not preserved or perfected when the mortgage was registered.
      • No written notice of the liens was given to the First Mortgagee.
    • Maximum Lien Holdback: Priority of lien claims was limited to the statutory holdback of $1,979,540.34, per the Construction Act.
  3. Statutory Framework:

    • Under Construction Act, s. 78, liens have priority over mortgages unless:
      • The lien is not preserved or perfected.
      • The mortgagee lacks notice of the lien before advancing funds.
  4. Arguments by Lien Claimants:

    • Alleged fraud in securing the mortgage to evade creditors.
    • Claimed equitable liens and priority under other statutes (e.g., Fraudulent Conveyances Act).
    • The court rejected these arguments due to insufficient evidence of fraud or priority.
  5. Outcome:

    • The motion favored the First Mortgagee, allowing distributions of sale proceeds (after holdback) to reduce the mortgage debt.
    • Costs of $75,000 were awarded against the Lien Claimants.
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-24-00713783-00CL
Corporate & commercial law
$ 75,000
Applicant
30 January 2024