Gill v. Siekham
Manpreet Gill, by litigation guardian Gurvinder Gill
Law Firm / Organization
Parsons Corrin LLP
Himmat Singh Gill, by litigation guardian Gurvinder Gill
Law Firm / Organization
Parsons Corrin LLP
Shangara Siekham
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

L. Beukman

Law Firm / Organization
Meridian Law Group
Lawyer(s)

Lucy Yuan

Anju Siekham
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

L. Beukman

Law Firm / Organization
Meridian Law Group
Lawyer(s)

Lucy Yuan

Diana Bellefontaine
Korus Tavana
The City of Surrey
John Does 1-4
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Xiao Li Lin
Law Firm / Organization
Harris & Brun Law Corporation
Lawyer(s)

Ryan Monty

Hardeep Gill
Law Firm / Organization
Lerner Law Corporation
Lawyer(s)

Sean Lerner

Harwinder Gill
Law Firm / Organization
Lerner Law Corporation
Lawyer(s)

Sean Lerner

  • Facts: Involved two accidents; a pedestrian-motor vehicle collision at a Surrey crosswalk (MVA #1) and a rear-end collision on Highway 91 near Richmond (MVA #2).
  • Issue: Determination of negligence and liability in both MVAs, considering driver and pedestrian actions, and city's role in maintaining safe crosswalk conditions.
  • Court's Ruling: Shared responsibility in MVA #1 between driver and pedestrians due to inattention, and shared liability among drivers in MVA #2. The city was found not negligent regarding crosswalk signage.
  • Successful Parties: Mixed; liability was apportioned among various parties in both incidents.
  • Damages/Costs: The document did not specify the exact amount of costs or damages awarded.
Supreme Court of British Columbia
M183904
Civil litigation
Other