Hougen Co. Ltd. v Su
Ming Su
Law Firm / Organization
Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
Lawyer(s)

Gavin Cameron

Toyomoto Canada Supply Chain Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Hougen Co. Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Bojm, Funt & Gibbons LLP
Lawyer(s)

David W. Gibbons

  • Context: Hougen Co. Ltd. (Petitioner) vs. Ming Su and Toyomoto Canada Supply Chain Inc. (Respondents).
  • Background: Hougen sought to sue in the name of Toyomoto, a company where Hougen is a shareholder. Hougen alleged that Ming Su, a director of Toyomoto, mismanaged the company and misappropriated corporate opportunities/assets.
  • Issue: Hougen filed a Notice of Civil Claim (NOCC) without court leave, which Ming Su contested as a nullity or abuse of process.
  • Court’s Decision: The court found the NOCC null and void, as it was filed without required leave under the Business Corporations Act. Hougen's action was seen as unilateral and without proper authority.
  • Nunc Pro Tunc Application: Hougen sought a nunc pro tunc order (retroactive validation) for the NOCC. The court rejected this, emphasizing statutory requirements and potential prejudice to the defendants.
  • Costs: Special costs were awarded to Ms. Su due to Hougen's conduct. Financial terms not secified.
Supreme Court of British Columbia
S226845
Corporate & commercial law
Respondent