Background: Dona alleged police surveillance and harassment, claiming psychological and physical harm. He sued for Charter rights violations and sought various prohibitions against police, public authorities, and others.
Issues: The court examined whether Dona's claims and motion had jurisdiction or factual/legal basis, and if they should be dismissed under Rule 74.
Court's Decision: The court found the motion and claims frivolous, lacking jurisdiction and factual/legal basis. It dismissed Dona's action in entirety, ordering the removal of his statement of claim and motion materials from the court file.
Outcome: No costs awarded, and the action was dismissed without leave to amend or refile.
