Tut v. Evershine Land Group Inc.
Kamaljit Kaur Tut
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Evershine Land Group Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

W.D. MacLeod

Guneet Grewal
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

W.D. MacLeod

Amarjit Singh Tut
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented

Background:

  • Property: Evershine Land Group Inc. owned a parcel of land in Surrey, B.C., with a house and coach house ("Property").
  • Purchase Agreement (2014): Ms. Tut agreed to buy the Property for $635,000, with specific payment terms and rental obligations until completion.
  • Non-Compliance: Ms. Tut failed to meet several contractual obligations, including timely payment of deposits and rent.
  • Occupancy Issues: Despite the failure to complete the purchase, the Tuts continued to occupy the Property, with sporadic rental payments.

Legal Proceedings:

  • Court of Appeal (2021-2022): The plaintiff's appeal against the initial judgment favoring the defendants was dismissed.
  • Subsequent Hearings and Non-Compliance: The Tuts failed to comply with several court orders, including providing documents and information about rent and occupants.
  • Registrar's Hearing and Mathematical Corrections: The Registrar found the Tuts owed substantial rent and unauthorized rent collection, totaling $216,000.

Judgment:

  • Total Amount Due: The Tuts are ordered to pay $216,000 to Evershine.
  • Special Costs: The Tuts are responsible for special costs of the action and this hearing.

Conclusion:

This case highlights the legal consequences of failing to adhere to contractual obligations and court orders, resulting in a significant financial judgment against the plaintiffs. The decision underscores the importance of compliance with legal agreements and court directives.

Supreme Court of British Columbia
S217930
Civil litigation
$ 216,000
Defendant