McKee v. Hicks
Maxwell Robert Fox McKee
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

G. Collette

Dr. Tracy Eugene Hicks
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

E. LeDuc

J. Morris

Background:

  • Maxwell McKee sustained a permanent arm deformity due to negligent medical treatment by Dr. Hicks following a fracture. Dr. Hicks admitted liability, and the dispute was over the damages.

Key Legal Issues:

  • Assessment of loss of future earning capacity and loss of future housekeeping capacity.

Court of Appeal's Findings:

  • Loss of Future Earning Capacity: The lower court's award of $65,000 was deemed insufficient and based on flawed reasoning regarding economic evidence, resulting in an increased award of $250,000.
  • Loss of Future Housekeeping Capacity: The appeal regarding this issue was dismissed as the lower court correctly included this loss in the non-pecuniary damages.

Reasoning:

  • The court found that the original judge did not appropriately consider relevant economic evidence when valuing the appellant’s loss of future earning capacity, leading to an inordinately low estimate.
  • Regarding housekeeping capacity, the judge’s decision to include it within non-pecuniary damages was upheld as she correctly identified this as a compensable loss, albeit not requiring a separate pecuniary award.

Outcome:

  • The appeal was allowed in part concerning the loss of future earning capacity but dismissed regarding the loss of housekeeping capacity.
Court of Appeals for British Columbia
CA47882
Personal injury law
$ 250,000
Appellant