Sahota v. Sandher
Jaspal Singh Sahota
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

J. Singh

Baldip Kaur Sahota
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

J. Singh

Amanpal Singh Sahota
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

J. Singh

Mohinder Singh Sandher
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Nadev Singh Sandher
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
1186368 B.C. Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Balpreet Singh Bal
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

C.R. Anninos

Amandeep Amy Kaur Bal
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

C.R. Anninos

Kiranjt Gill Harprit Singh Gill
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Harshvir Kaur Buttar
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Prabhjopal Singh Brar
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
1148991 B.C. Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Jaspreet Batra
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
Nachhattar Singh Sra
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Balwinder Kaur Sra
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
KSP Shahi Catering & Sweets Ltd
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
His Majesty the King in Right of the Province of British Columbia
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified

Background:

  • Property: 5585 148 Street, Surrey, BC.
  • Initial Contract: Appellants agreed to buy the property for $2,350,000, but the sale was not court-approved due to insufficient funds to discharge existing mortgages.
  • Foreclosure: Proceedings initiated in August 2022.
  • Competing Sale: In June 2023, the Bals agreed to sell the property to Dalvir Singh Khangura for $3.3 million, which the court approved.

Key Issues:

  1. Specific Performance: Appellants sought to enforce their prior purchase agreement.
  2. Court Approval: The sale to Khangura satisfied nearly all mortgage holders.
  3. Application for Stay: Appellants applied to stay the sale pending appeal, claiming unique interest and potential prejudice.

Court's Analysis:

  • Specific Performance Claim: Found bound to fail as the original offer was not court-approved.
  • Procedural Arguments: No procedural error in approving the Khangura sale; no competing bids were presented.
  • Unique Interest Argument: Insufficient evidence of unique interest in the property.
  • Balance of Convenience: Prejudice to the Bals outweighed appellants' arguments.

Conclusion:

  • Stay Application: Dismissed. The court allowed the sale to Khangura to proceed, finding no merit in the appellants' claims.

Outcome: Sale to Dalvir Singh Khangura approved; appellants' application for a stay dismissed.

Court of Appeals for British Columbia
CA49230
Real estate
$ 3,300,000
Respondent