Aboutaleb-Maragheh v. Khanlari
Payman Khanlari
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
Sanam Sarah Khanlari
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
Hossein Aboutaleb-Maragheh
Law Firm / Organization
Rochon Genova LLP

Background

  • The plaintiff, Hossein Aboutaleb-Maragheh, advanced $300,000 USD to the defendant, Payman Khanlari.
  • The Superior Court of Justice awarded summary judgment against Payman Khanlari for unjust enrichment, ordering him to pay $406,960 CAN.
  • The claim against Sanam Sarah Khanlari was dismissed.

Appeal Points

  1. Abandonment of Argument:

    • Payman Khanlari argued he was unfairly treated as a self-represented litigant because the motion judge did not explain the implications of abandoning an argument.
    • The appeal court rejected this, noting the motion judge described Khanlari as "intelligent, articulate and well-prepared."
  2. Credibility and Factual Determinations:

    • Khanlari contended that the motion judge erred in granting summary judgment due to unresolved credibility assessments and competing factual determinations.
    • The appeal court found no error in the motion judge's application of summary judgment principles.

Key Findings

  • Funds Advancement: The plaintiff advanced $300,000 USD to the appellant.
  • No Contract: There was no meeting of the minds regarding the terms and conditions for the advancement of the money.
  • Unjust Enrichment: The motion judge concluded that Khanlari was unjustly enriched by the $300,000 payment.

Appeal Decision

  • The appeal court agreed with the finding of unjust enrichment but modified the judgment amount.
  • Payments made by Khanlari to Aboutaleb-Maragheh totaling $26,925 CAN were recognized and deducted from the original judgment.
  • Revised Judgment: $380,035 CAN in favor of the respondent.

Costs

  • No costs were awarded on the appeal due to the divided success of the appeal.
Court of Appeal for Ontario
COA-23-CV-0176
Civil litigation
$ 380,035
Respondent