20 Nov 2023
JAVERIA REHMAN v THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Case Overview:
- Rehman sought judicial review of decisions made by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), denying her eligibility for various emergency benefits (CERB, CRB, CRSB, CRCB) related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The denial was based on her failure to demonstrate the required income threshold.
Key Legal Points:
- Benefits' Income Requirements: Eligibility for these benefits required a minimum income of $5,000 in employment or self-employment before applying.
- CRA's Validation Process: CRA requested documentation to substantiate Rehman's claims for the benefits.
- Evidence Submitted by Rehman: She provided evidence of income replacement benefits from an accident, income from self-employment, and stated having a child in April 2020 as grounds for CRCB eligibility.
- CRA's Decision: The CRA found her evidence insufficient, determining that she did not meet the required income threshold.
Court's Analysis and Decision:
- Review of Evidence: The Court agreed with the CRA, finding no evidence that the income replacement benefits or self-employment income met the legislative requirements for the benefits.
- Standard of Review: The Court applied a reasonableness standard, assessing whether the CRA's decisions were justified and coherent in light of the evidence and legal constraints.
- Conclusion on CRA's Decision: The Court found the CRA's decisions reasonable and dismissed Rehman's application.
Conclusion:
- The Federal Court dismissed the application for judicial review, upholding the CRA's decisions as reasonable. The judgment was issued without costs.