Broggian Diffusione Spa v. Dina Fine Jewellery Ltd.
Broggian Diffusione Spa now known as B Distribuzione Spa in Liquidazione
Law Firm / Organization
McKechnie & Company
Lawyer(s)

Philip Di Tomaso

Dina Fine Jewellery Ltd. also known as Saatchi & Saatchi Fine Jewellery Since 1925 Ltd. also known as Saatchi & Saatchi Fine Jewellery Ltd. and the said Dina Fine Jewellery
Law Firm / Organization
Lawson Lundell LLP
Lawyer(s)

Kate Coady

Saatchi & Saatchi Fine Jewellery Since 1925 Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Lawson Lundell LLP
Lawyer(s)

Kate Coady

Saatchi & Saatchi Fine Jewellery Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Lawson Lundell LLP
Lawyer(s)

Kate Coady

- Broggian Diffusione Spa, an Italian wholesale jewellery distributor, sought $73,997 judgment against Dina Fine Jewellery Ltd. ("Dina") and Saatchi & Saatchi Fine Jewellery Since 1925 Ltd. ("Saatchi 1925 Ltd.") for alleged 2019 jewellery delivery. - Dina, based in Vancouver and trading as Saatchi & Saatchi Fine Jewellery, and Saatchi 1925 Ltd. disputed the summary trial's suitability, citing evidence conflicts. - Three main defenses presented by defendants: 1. Jewellery wasn't delivered to Dina. 2. Broggian hadn't accounted for all of Dina's payments. 3. Saatchi 1925 Ltd. wasn't part of the jewellery contracts. - Court's findings after examining evidence: - Dina did receive the jewellery. - Dina's payments were tied to different invoices. - Broggian couldn't prove Saatchi 1925 Ltd.'s contract involvement. - Judgment favored Broggian against Dina for $73,997 plus interest. - Action against Saatchi 1925 Ltd. was dismissed.
Supreme Court of British Columbia
S230030
Corporate & commercial law
$ 73,997
Plaintiff