Carbone v. Boccia
ALBERT CARBONE
Law Firm / Organization
Ross Nasseri LLP
CATHY HORVAT
Law Firm / Organization
Ross Nasseri LLP
SALVATORE BOCCIA
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
ROSANNA BOCCIA
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
215 HOLDING CORP
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
JANE DOE
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
JOHN DOE
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
DOE CORP.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
  • Facts: The plaintiffs, Albert Carbone and Cathy Horvat, alleged fraudulent misrepresentation and unjust enrichment by the defendants, Salvatore Boccia, Rosanna Boccia, 215 Holding Corp, David Shpilt, Pamela Atkinson, and others, claiming damages of $775,000 for investments in non-existent cannabis businesses and contracts.
  • Issues/Main Discussion: The plaintiffs sought to add David Shpilt and Pamela Atkinson as defendants, register a certificate of pending litigation against a property, amend their claim, and validate email service on Shpilt.
  • Ruling: The court granted the motion to add Shpilt as a defendant, allowed amendments related to him, validated email service, and ordered interim measures to prevent the transfer or sale of the contested property. The motion regarding Atkinson and other matters was adjourned.
  • Amount Awarded: Not applicable; the focus was on procedural and interim relief, with costs to be discussed at a later date.
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-22-00683894-0000
Corporate & commercial law
Plaintiff