TYLER PEARSON v. AGC
Tyler Pearson
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Attorney General of Canada
Law Firm / Organization
Department of Justice Canada
Lawyer(s)

Alice Zhao Jiang

Background:

  • Pearson worked at a supermarket until voluntarily resigning in September 2020, then applied for the Canada Recovery Benefit (CRB) from September 2020 to February 2021.
  • The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) initially accepted Pearson’s claims but later reviewed his eligibility, ultimately deciding he was ineligible as his resignation was voluntary and unrelated to COVID-19.

Legal Issues:

  1. CRB Eligibility: The main issue was whether Pearson’s voluntary resignation disqualified him from receiving CRB.
  2. Voluntary Resignation vs. COVID-19 Impact: Whether Pearson's unemployment and income reduction were directly related to COVID-19.

Judgment:

  • Judge: Madam Justice Walker
  • Decision: The application for judicial review was dismissed.
  • Reasoning:
    • The Court found the decision reasonable, as Pearson did not provide evidence linking his reduced hours or resignation to COVID-19.
    • Pearson’s voluntary resignation and subsequent unemployment were not sufficient to demonstrate eligibility for CRB under the COVID-19 related reduction criteria.
  • Costs: Pearson was ordered to pay $250.00 to the Respondent as costs.

Conclusion:

  • The Federal Court upheld the CRA's decision, emphasizing the necessity for clear evidence linking unemployment and income reduction to COVID-19 to qualify for CRB benefits.
Federal Court
T-936-22
Taxation
$ 250
Respondent
06 May 2022