Nedelec v. Rogers
GARY NEDELEC
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

ALEXANDER SAMANEK
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

MICHAEL S. SHEPPARD
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

DOUGLAS GOLDIE
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

GARY BEDBROOK
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

PIERRE GARNEAU
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

JACQUES COUTURE
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

LARRY JAMES LAIDMAN
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

ROBERT BRUCE MACDONALD
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

GORDON A.F. LEHMAN
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

PETER J.G. STIRLING
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

DAVID MALCOM MACDONALD
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

ROBERT WILLIAM JAMES
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

CAMIL GEOFFROY
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

BRIAN CAMPBELL
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

TREVOR DAVID ALLISON
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

BENOIT GAUTHIER
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

BRUCE LYN FANNING
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

MARC CARPENTIER
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

MARK IRVING DAVIS
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

RAYMOND CALVIN SCOTT JACKSON
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

JOHN BART ANDERSON
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

DAVID ALEXANDER FINDLAY
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

WARREN STANLEY DAVEY
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

KEITH WYLIE HANNAN
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

MICHAEL EDWARD RONAN
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

GILLES DESROCHERS
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

WILLIAM LANCE FRANK DANN
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

JOHN ANDREW CLARKE
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

BRADLEY JAMES ELLIS
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

MICHAEL ENNIS
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

STANLEY EDWARD JOHNS
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

THOMAS FREDERICK NOAKES
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

WILLIAM CHARLES RONAN
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

BARRETT RALPH THORNTON
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

DAVID ALLAN RAMSAY
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

HAROLD GEORGE EDWARD
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

HAROLD GEORGE EDWARD THOMAS
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

MURRAY JAMES KIDD
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

WILLIAM AYRE
Law Firm / Organization
Independent
Lawyer(s)

Raymond D. Hall

ERIC WILLIAM ROGERS
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
ROBERT JAMES MCBRIDE
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
JOHN CHARLES PINHEIRO
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
WILLIAM RONALD CLARK
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
STEPHEN NORMAN COLLIER
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
AIR CANADA
Law Firm / Organization
Air Canada Center Law Branch
AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL
Law Firm / Organization
Nelligan O'Brien Payne LLP
Lawyer(s)

Malini Vijaykumar

  • Parties: Gary Nedelec and others (Applicants) vs. Eric William Rogers and others (Respondents).
  • Background: Former Air Canada pilots alleged age discrimination for mandatory retirement at age 60.
  • Issue: Judicial review of an interlocutory decision by the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal regarding the pilots' complaint.
  • Court's Decision: The application for judicial review was dismissed as premature.
  • Outcome: The case highlights the importance of exhausting administrative processes before seeking judicial review.

This case underscores the administrative law principle that generally precludes seeking judicial review of interlocutory administrative decisions unless under exceptional circumstances.

Federal Court
T-2200-22
Human rights
$ 1,000
Respondent
24 October 2022