Power Workers’ Union v. Canada (Attorney General)
THOMAS SHIELDS
Law Firm / Organization
Wright Henry LLP
Law Firm / Organization
Pink Larkin
Lawyer(s)

Brenda Comeau

MATTHEW STEWART
Law Firm / Organization
Wright Henry LLP
Law Firm / Organization
Pink Larkin
Lawyer(s)

Brenda Comeau

GREG MACLEOD
Law Firm / Organization
Wright Henry LLP
Law Firm / Organization
Pink Larkin
Lawyer(s)

Brenda Comeau

SCOTT LAMPMAN
Law Firm / Organization
Wright Henry LLP
Law Firm / Organization
Pink Larkin
Lawyer(s)

Brenda Comeau

PAUL CATAHNO
Law Firm / Organization
Wright Henry LLP
Law Firm / Organization
Pink Larkin
Lawyer(s)

Brenda Comeau

CHRIS DAMANT
Law Firm / Organization
Wright Henry LLP
Law Firm / Organization
Pink Larkin
Lawyer(s)

Brenda Comeau

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 37
Law Firm / Organization
Wright Henry LLP
Law Firm / Organization
Pink Larkin
Lawyer(s)

Brenda Comeau

THE CHALK RIVER NUCLEAR SAFETY OFFICERS ASSOCIATION
Law Firm / Organization
Wright Henry LLP
Law Firm / Organization
Pink Larkin
Lawyer(s)

Brenda Comeau

SOCIETY OF UNITED PROFESSIONALS
Law Firm / Organization
Wright Henry LLP
Law Firm / Organization
Pink Larkin
Lawyer(s)

Brenda Comeau

POWER WORKERS’ UNION
Law Firm / Organization
Wright Henry LLP
Law Firm / Organization
Pink Larkin
Lawyer(s)

Brenda Comeau

Background:

  • The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) implemented pre-employment and random drug and alcohol testing for sensitive positions in nuclear power plants.
  • The applicants challenged this policy (RegDoc 2.2.4, Fitness for Duty, Volume II: Managing Alcohol and Drug Use) as unconstitutional under sections 7, 8, and 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Key Issues and Rulings:

  1. Charter Applicability: The CNSC, as a governmental entity, is subject to the Charter.
  2. Section 8 (Search and Seizure):
    • Engagement: Collecting bodily samples constitutes a "seizure."
    • Reasonable Expectation of Privacy: Despite diminished privacy due to the regulated nature of their work, workers’ privacy rights are engaged.
    • Authorization: The CNSC's broad regulatory powers under the Nuclear Safety and Control Act authorize the testing.
    • Reasonableness: Given the critical safety concerns in the nuclear industry, the testing provisions are reasonable.
  3. Section 7 (Life, Liberty, Security): The testing provisions do not infringe on section 7 rights as they are necessary for safety.
  4. Section 15 (Equality): The policy does not discriminate and applies uniformly to all Safety-Critical Workers.

Conclusion:

  • Judgment: The application for judicial review was dismissed. The CNSC’s testing policy is constitutional and reasonable.
  • The total monetary award/costs/damages granted/ordered is not specified in the provided excerpts from the judgment.
Federal Court
T-1222-21
Administrative law
Respondent