In the case of Capital Now vs. Munro, dated February 9, 2023, the petitioner, Capital Now Inc. ("Capital Now"), and the appellants, John and Rachel Munro, had been involved in a lending and borrowing arrangement that spanned approximately 12 years. The relationship between the parties deteriorated in 2020. Capital Now filed a foreclosure petition. Meanwhile, the respondents, the Munros, also filed a notice of application seeking an order to cross-examine a Capital Now representative. Consequently, the master granted an order nisi in favor of Capital Now, including a redemption period and a personal judgment against the Munros. The Munros appealed these orders, arguing that a summary determination had been inappropriate and that the master had exceeded his jurisdiction. Capital Now argued that the appellants had failed to present a true defense and that there were no bona fide triable issues. The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the master’s order nisi, and converting the petition into an action. No specific information regarding a financial award was provided in the case.