Yenal v. Sahota
Bora Yenal
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

S.E. Gibson

Kamaljit Sahota
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Sukhwant Singh Takhar
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

S. Cordell

Balvinder Sahota
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

S. Cordell

Amaroo Estate (2017) Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
ABC Construction Company
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
John Doe
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
The Corporation of the Township of Langley
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Ronald Zaruk
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Norm-Ron Construction (1988) Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Norm-Ron Construction (1998) Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Dennis Murphy
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Yajun Chen
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Zi Li Chen (also known as Li Zi Chen or Zi Li)
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Sanjeevneel Kaur Takhar
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

S. Cordell

Jasbir Kaur Sahota
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

S. Cordell

Gurdeep Sahota
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
  • Background: A lawsuit involving multiple parties related to the collapse of a deck at a residential property, resulting in personal injuries.
  • Facts:
    • Plaintiff: Bora Yenal.
    • Defendants: Gurdeep Sahota, Kamaljit Sahota, and others, including previous property owners Yajun Chen and Zi Li Chen.
  • Issues/Main Discussion: The plaintiff sought to amend the Notice of Civil Claim to add claims of negligent and fraudulent misrepresentation against the Chen defendants, who were former owners of the property.
  • Ruling: The court allowed the amendment, emphasizing the need for a generous approach to amendments and indicating that the Chen defendants had not shown that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success at trial.
  • Amount Awarded: The decision focused on procedural aspects, particularly the allowance of further amendments to the Notice of Civil Claim. No specific monetary judgment was awarded at this stage.
Supreme Court of British Columbia
S1910540
Civil litigation
Plaintiff