Az-Zahraa Housing Society v. Attorney General of Canada
AZ-ZAHRAA HOUSING SOCIETY
Law Firm / Organization
Thorsteinssons LLP
THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE
Law Firm / Organization
Department of Justice Canada
Lawyer(s)

Cindy Mah

Background:

  • Az-Zahraa Housing Society, a non-profit providing affordable housing in Richmond, British Columbia, sought designation as a municipality under the GST/HST rebate mechanism in the Excise Tax Act.
  • The Minister denied this designation, based on criteria requiring government funding. The Society's arrangements with BC Housing didn't involve direct government funding.
  • The Society argued that the Minister’s delegate improperly applied administrative criteria, ignoring broader economic rationale of their arrangements.

Legal Issues:

  1. Municipality Designation Eligibility: Whether the Society met the criteria for designation as a municipality for GST/HST rebate purposes.
  2. Fettering of Discretion: Assessment of whether the Minister’s delegate rigidly applied administrative criteria without considering the unique economic circumstances of the Society's agreements.
  3. Definition of Government Funding: Examination of whether the Society's arrangements with BC Housing constituted government funding.

Judgment:

  • Judge: Mr. Justice Sébastien Grammond
  • Decision: The application for judicial review was granted.
  • Reasoning:
    • The Court found that the Minister’s delegate fettered her discretion by strictly applying the administrative criteria.
    • The delegate failed to consider the broader economic implications of the Society's agreements with BC Housing, which indirectly provided government assistance.
    • The decision was deemed unreasonable due to the rigid interpretation of the term "government funding."

Conclusion:

  • The Federal Court granted the Society’s judicial review application, emphasizing the importance of considering the full context and economic reality in administrative decision-making. The case highlighted the limitations of strictly adhering to administrative guidelines without considering unique circumstances.
Federal Court
T-2047-22
Taxation
Applicant
03 October 2022