Telus Communications Inc. v. Vidéotron Ltée
TELUS COMMUNICATIONS INC.
VIDÉOTRON LTÉE
BELL MOBILITY INC
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
BRAGG COMMUNICATIONS INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
CITYWEST CABLE AND TELEPHONE CORP
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
COGECO CONNEXION INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
COMCENTRIC NETWORKING INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
ECOTEL INC
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
IRISTEL INC
Law Firm / Organization
Tacit Law
LEMALU HOLDINGS LTD.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
1085459 ONTARIO LTD.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
O/A KINGSTON ONLINE SERVICES
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
MULTIBOARD COMMUNICATIONS INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
508896 ALBERTA LTD
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
O/A NETAGO
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
NEXICOM INC.,
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS CANADA INC
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
SASKATCHEWAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
SOGETEL INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
STAR SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
TBAYTEL
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
TERRESTAR SOLUTIONS INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
THOMAS COMMUNICATIONS LTD
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
VALLEY FIBER LTD
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
FIBRENOIRE INC.
XPLORNET COMMUNICATIONS INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified

Issue:

Telus challenged the decision allowing Vidéotron to bid on set-aside spectrum in the 2021 3500 MHz spectrum auction, crucial for 5G technology.

Legal Framework:

  • Statutes: Department of Industry Act, Radiocommunication Act, Telecommunications Act
  • Regulations: Radiocommunication Regulations
  • Minister's Authority: Issue licenses, set terms, manage spectrum allocation

Key Points:

  • Spectrum: Limited resource essential for telecommunications and 5G.
  • Set-Aside Spectrum: Reserved for smaller carriers, excluding NMSPs (Telus, Bell, Rogers).
  • Eligibility Criteria: Providers must actively offer commercial telecommunications services in the relevant area.

Judicial Review:

  • Procedural Fairness:
    • Telus claimed lack of transparency and fairness.
    • Court found the process and decision fair and reasonable.
  • Reasonableness:
    • The decision-making process was justified based on the Framework and Clarification Document by ISED.
    • Verification by ISED, including assessments and additional documentation, was appropriate.

Conclusion:

The court dismissed Telus' application, upholding Vidéotron’s eligibility to bid on set-aside spectrum. This decision supports competition in telecommunications while managing spectrum as a public resource. No financial terms specified.

Federal Court
T-1335-21
Administrative law
Respondent