In Bell Canada v. Red Rhino Entertainment Inc., the Federal Court imposed a $40,000 fine on the respondents for violating a copyright-related interlocutory injunction. The appellants attempted to increase the fine through a motion and appeal, but both were dismissed. The judge applied a test for admitting fresh evidence on appeal and determined that the appellants had not been diligent in pursuing it. The Court of Appeal upheld the penalty, emphasizing deference to the sentencing judge and stating that penalties for contempt serve compliance while civil damages compensate and deter. The Court found the penalty reasonable, rejected suggestions to increase costs or impose imprisonment, and upheld the Federal Court's decision. The appeal and motion were proposed to be dismissed, with the opportunity for cost submissions and responses.
