Mario Ghafari v. Attorney General of Canada
MARIO GHAFARI
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA (STATISTICS CANADA)
Law Firm / Organization
Department of Justice Canada
  • Mario Ghafari applied for judicial review of a decision by the Federal Public Service Labour Relations and Employment Board (Board) from September 12, 2022. This decision dismissed his complaint alleging abuse of authority in an internal job appointment process.
  • Ghafari had applied for a senior methodologist role at Statistics Canada (MA-04 classification).
  • The appointment process involved screening candidates based on the public service performance assessment (PSPA) and a "track record" detailing how they met six essential competencies. Directors validated these track records.
  • Ghafari's director, Mr. Dolson, did not validate Ghafari's qualifications for any of the six competencies. Dolson communicated with two of Ghafari's section chiefs but not his direct supervisor.
  • After rejection, Ghafari received feedback from Mr. Matthews of the selection panel. Matthews had Ghafari's track record reviewed by Mr. Laniel, an assistant director, who found Ghafari met two of the six competencies.
  • Ghafari complained to the Board under section 77 of the Public Service Employment Act, highlighting: Alleged bias by Dolson based on past interactions.
  • Issues with his initial PSPA, which he believed disadvantaged him.
  • Dolson's failure to consult with Ghafari's direct supervisors.
  • Dolson's inaccurate assessment.
  • The Board dismissed Ghafari's complaint, noting he hadn't proven bias or other abuse of authority.
  • Ghafari sought judicial review, emphasizing breaches of procedural fairness and an alleged oversight of significant evidence by the Board.
Federal Court of Appeal
A-216-22
Labour law
Respondent