Canadian Western Bank v Index Holding Group Inc. et al
CANADIAN WESTERN BANK
Law Firm / Organization
Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
Lawyer(s)

Jeremy Bornstein

Law Firm / Organization
Dickinson Wright LLP
Lawyer(s)

Lisa S. Corne

INDEX HOLDING GROUP INC. ET AL
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
INDEX GROUP OF COMPANIES INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
INDEX INTERNATIONAL INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
INDEX FOODS INC
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
2640179 ONTARIO INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
11030434 CANADA LTD
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
2700774 ONTARIO INC
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
2700767 ONTARIO INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
2683960 ONTARIO LTD.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
11030418 CANADA INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
2723710 ONTARIO INC
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
2718366 ONTARIO INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
2737332 ONTARIO INC
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
2737334 ONTARIO INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
2723714 ONTARIO INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
2723716 ONTARIO INC
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
2737338 ONTARIO INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
2790760 ONTARIO INC
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
2775290 ONTARIO INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
2775296 ONTARIO INC
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
421 WHARNCLIFFE LTD
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
425 WHARNCLIFFE ROAD INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Abdul Muqeet
Law Firm / Organization
Blaney McMurtry LLP
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented

Background:

  • Applicant: Canadian Western Bank.
  • Respondents: Index Holding Group Inc. and associated entities, with Abdul Muqeet as the sole officer and director.
  • Respondents were placed under receivership in May 2023 due to financial issues.
  • Court-appointed Receiver identified questionable transactions and sought compliance from Abdul Muqeet for document production and examination under oath.

Key Developments:

  1. Non-compliance: Abdul Muqeet repeatedly failed to comply with court orders, including:
    • Missing mandated examinations.
    • Failing to provide complete answers to questions and undertakings.
    • Providing delayed, incomplete responses despite opportunities to purge contempt.
  2. Contempt Finding: Justice Black found Mr. Muqeet in contempt on June 7, 2024, following a clear demonstration of willful breach of court orders.
  3. Sentencing:
    • Justice Penny emphasized the principles of coercion and maintaining respect for court authority in contempt proceedings.
    • Recognizing Mr. Muqeet’s eventual, albeit delayed, compliance, a five-day jail sentence was imposed.
    • A fine was deemed unsuitable due to Mr. Muqeet’s financial state.

Key Legal Points:

  • Purpose of Contempt Sentencing: To enforce compliance, deter non-compliance, and uphold court authority.
  • Factors Considered in Sentencing:
    • Nature and gravity of contempt.
    • Need for deterrence and proportionality.
    • Impecunious status of the contemnor.

Costs:

  • The Receiver sought costs, but no cost award was made due to Mr. Muqeet’s financial constraints and absence of a cost summary.
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-23-00698447-00CL
Corporate & commercial law
$ 0
Applicant
25 April 2023