Context and Allegations:

• Asghar alleged damages against Crown officials for torts, including incidents at Pearson Airport involving secondary examination, luggage damage, harassment, and forced federal quarantine.

Federal Court's Findings:

• Asghar's Statement of Claim was struck out as it disclosed no reasonable cause of action, contained insufficient details, unfounded attacks, broad conspiracy allegations, and included claims outside the court's jurisdiction.

Federal Court of Appeal's Decision:

• Appeal dismissed, upholding the lower court's order.
• The Court found no error in the Federal Court's application of legal tests and guidelines.
• Asghar's submissions failed to present a reviewable error and were deemed more of a tirade than a legal argument.

Conclusion:

• The case highlights the need for detailed legal pleadings and bases in claims, underscoring the courts' role in dismissing unfounded or vexatious claims. The decision illustrates the challenges self-represented litigants face in meeting legal standards and maintaining appropriate conduct in court proceedings.