BELL MEDIA INC. V. MACCIACCHERA (SMOOTHSTREAMS.TV)
ROGERS MEDIA INC.
COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES, INC.
DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC.
PARAMOUNT PICTURES CORPORATION
UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS LLC
UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS PRODUCTIONS LLLP
WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC.
MARSHALL MACCIACCHERA dba SMOOTHSTREAMS.TV
Law Firm / Organization
Lomic Law
ANTONIO MACCIACCHERA dba SMOOTHSTREAMS.TV
Law Firm / Organization
Lomic Law
Lawyer(s)

Paul V. Lomic

ARM HOSTING INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Lomic Law
Lawyer(s)

Paul V. Lomic

STAR HOSTING LIMITED (HONG KONG)
Law Firm / Organization
Lomic Law
Lawyer(s)

Paul V. Lomic

ROMA WORKS LIMITED (HONG KONG)
Law Firm / Organization
Lomic Law
Lawyer(s)

Paul V. Lomic

ROMA WORKS SA (PANAMA)
Law Firm / Organization
Lomic Law
Lawyer(s)

Paul V. Lomic

Background:

  • Bell Media Inc. and others (Plaintiffs) against Antonio Macciacchera and others (Defendants) regarding Smoothstreams.tv.
  • Focus on contempt charges against Antonio Macciacchera.

Key Points:

  1. Contempt Charges:

    • Antonio Macciacchera faced contempt charges for breaching an Anton Piller Order (June 28, 2022).
    • Found in contempt on four charges; others dismissed due to insufficient evidence.
  2. Costs Award:

    • Antonio ordered to pay $91,742.86, covering 73% of Plaintiffs' legal fees, plus HST and disbursements.
    • Payment ordered "forthwith."
  3. Confidentiality Order:

    • Partially granted for Plaintiffs' cost-sharing and litigation strategy details.
  4. Court's Emphasis:

    • Importance of adhering to court orders and maintaining justice system integrity.
    • Antonio's non-cooperation influenced cost and urgency of payment.
  5. Representation and Legal Fees:

    • Plaintiffs represented by Smart & Biggar LLP.
    • Legal fees scrutinized, mostly deemed reasonable.

Outcome:

  • Successful Party: Bell Media Inc. and others.
  • Antonio Macciacchera ordered to immediately pay significant costs due to contempt of court, with the amount reflecting the case's complexity and his non-compliance.
Federal Court
T-1257-22
Intellectual property
$ 91,743
Plaintiff
17 June 2022