Background: Karen Tyler sought judicial review of the Canadian Human Rights Commission's decision not to address her complaint against the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). Her complaint related to alleged discrimination.

Decision: The Federal Court found the Commission's decision unreasonable and procedurally unfair. The Court noted the Commission did not properly consider Tyler's evidence and arguments, particularly regarding the CRA's investigatory process.

Key Points:

1. Procedural Fairness: The Court found the Commission's procedural handling of Tyler's complaint lacked fairness.
2. Reasonableness of Commission's Decision: The decision was deemed unreasonable, failing to address central issues and evidence presented by Tyler.
3. Remedial Action: The Court remitted the matter back to the Commission for redetermination without directing a particular outcome.

Conclusion: This case highlights the necessity for administrative bodies to thoroughly consider evidence and arguments in decision-making processes and maintain procedural fairness.

Financial terms not specified.