R. v. McGregor
Corporal C.R. McGregor
Law Firm / Organization
Defence Counsel Services
His Majesty The King
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Attorney General of Ontario
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Canadian Constitution Foundation
British Columbia Civil Liberties Association
Law Firm / Organization
Olthuis Van Ert
Canadian Civil Liberties Association
Law Firm / Organization
Friedman Mansour LLP
David Asper Centre for Constitutional Rights
Law Firm / Organization
Stockwoods LLP
  • Facts: Corporal C.R. McGregor, a member of the Canadian Armed Forces, was investigated for criminal activity in Virginia, USA. The investigation involved a search of McGregor's residence and electronic devices, resulting in his conviction for several offences.
  • Issues: The case examined the extraterritorial application of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, specifically section 8's protection against unreasonable search and seizure.
  • Ruling: The appeal was dismissed. The court found that the search and seizure did not infringe McGregor’s rights under section 8 of the Charter. The Canadian Forces National Investigation Service (CFNIS) cooperated with local authorities, obtaining a lawful warrant under Virginia law. The evidence discovered during the search was deemed admissible.
  • Key Points:
    • The Charter's applicability in foreign jurisdictions was discussed but ultimately not central to the ruling.
    • The search was found to be reasonable, authorized by law, and conducted in a reasonable manner.
    • The court applied the plain view doctrine, justifying the seizure of evidence discovered inadvertently during the search.
  • No financial terms specified in the document.
Supreme Court of Canada
39543
Criminal law
Respondent