Eugene Ndhlovu v. His Majesty the King
Ndhlovu, Eugene
Law Firm / Organization
Iginla & Company
Lawyer(s)

Elvis Iginla

His Majesty the King
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

Jason R. Russell

Attorney General of Canada
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Attorney General of Ontario
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

Michael S. Dunn

Attorney General of Quebec
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Attorney General of Nova Scotia
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

Glenn Hubbard

Criminal Lawyers' Association (Ontario)
Law Firm / Organization
Daniel Brown Law LLP
Lawyer(s)

Mark C. Halfyard

Canadian Civil Liberties Association
Law Firm / Organization
Henein Hutchison Robitaille LLP
Law Firm / Organization
MacKay Boyar Law Corporation
Lawyer(s)

Carly Peddle

HIV & AIDS Legal Clinic Ontario and HIV Legal Network
Law Firm / Organization
HIV & AIDS Legal Clinic Ontario (HALCO)
Lawyer(s)

Ryan Peck

Mobile Legal Clinic
Law Firm / Organization
Mobile Legal Clinic
Lawyer(s)

Donald Tremblay

Association québécoise des avocats et avocates de la défense (AQAAD)
Law Firm / Organization
Bureau d'aide juridique d'Amqui
Lawyer(s)

Hugo Caissy

Law Firm / Organization
Pelletier-Quirion Lawyers
The appellant pled guilty to two charges of sexual assault, contrary to s. 271 of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46. The assaults had been committed against two complainants during the course of a party. The sentencing judge found the appellant was at low risk to reoffend, and sentenced him to six months of imprisonment and three years of probation. The appellant challenged the constitutionality of ss. 490.012 and 490.013(2.1) of the Criminal Code, which require him to register and report for life under the Sex Offender Information Registration Act, S.C. 2004, c. 10, as a result of his convictions for more than one designated offence. The sentencing judge held that ss. 490.012 and 490.013(2.1) violate s. 7 of the Charter and cannot be saved under s. 1, and declared the sections to be of no force or effect. The Crown appealed the sentencing judge’s declaration of unconstitutionality. The majority of the Court of Appeal for Alberta allowed the appeal, holding that the sentencing judge had erred in finding that the appellant had established a deprivation of his right to life, liberty or security of the person under s. 7 of the Charter.
Supreme Court of Canada
39360
Criminal law
08 February 2022
No uploaded documents