Stephanie Difederico filed a proposed class action against Amazon, alleging price-fixing agreements with third-party sellers, violating the Competition Act. She sought damages under the Act.
Legal Proceedings
Amazon moved to stay the proceedings, citing an arbitration agreement in its Conditions of Use.
The Federal Court granted the stay, directing the matter to arbitration.
Difederico appealed, arguing her claims were not commercial and thus outside the arbitration agreement's scope.
Court's Decision
The Court found the arbitration agreement valid and applicable.
It held that Difederico's relationship with Amazon and her claims had a commercial foundation.
The appeal was dismissed, upholding the arbitration agreement and the stay of proceedings.
